Establish what right or asset the payment acquired, whether any code was delivered and the prospects of recovery. A missing developer does not automatically make the entire project budget a current deductible loss.

A specific business-owner situation

A business prepays a system build. The developer stops responding after delivering partial code, and the business considers a legal claim. The remaining code, refund right and unfinished work need separate evaluation.

Illustrative example, not a client result.

What to establish before filing

  1. Reconcile paid amounts and delivered work.
  2. Document refund and ownership rights.
  3. Assess abandonment and recovery prospects before selecting treatment.

Which fact changes the answer?

A refundable service deposit differs from ownership of partially completed code. Preserve the contract's rights and actual deliverables so the advisor can classify both the remaining asset and any failed claim.

A mistake to avoid

Writing off the full deposit while continuing to use valuable delivered software can overstate the loss.

Records that support the decision

  • Development contract.
  • Code and delivery records.
  • Payment history.
  • Demand and recovery correspondence.

The decision to document

Ask for a component-level closeout schedule and supported loss timing. Track later refunds or recoveries against the original workpaper rather than treating them as unrelated receipts.

Business-owner tax planning and coordination · Discuss your business and advisory needs

Related questions

Sources and editorial context

General educational information prepared with AI assistance. No individual professional review is claimed. Apply the relevant tax-year rules to the actual records. Editorial policy · AI disclosure.

Business Owners: Are You Overpaying on Taxes?

Get Your Free Tax Assessment