U.S. assembly and export destination do not alone establish qualified export property. Section 993 requires qualifying U.S. manufacture, production, growth or extraction, with no more than 50% of fair market value attributable to imported articles. The manufacturing and foreign-content tests require actual product-level support.

A specific business-owner situation

A manufacturer assembles imported components in the United States and exports the finished unit. Its U.S. shipping address does not prove every product meets the export-property definition.

Illustrative example, not a client result.

What to establish before filing

  1. Establish the U.S. manufacturing activity.
  2. Calculate imported content under the applicable valuation rule.
  3. Verify foreign use and excluded-property rules.

Which fact changes the answer?

Meaningful qualifying production differs from minor handling, and imported-content value can independently affect eligibility. Both tests matter.

A mistake to avoid

Do not substitute a marketing made-in-USA claim for the tax definition.

Records that support the decision

  • Bills of materials.
  • Import valuation and production records.
  • Destination evidence.

The decision to document

Maintain a product-level qualification file before including sales in an IC-DISC commission base.

Business-owner tax planning and preparation scope · Discuss advisory scope with AE

Related questions

Sources and editorial context

General educational information prepared with AI assistance. No individual professional review is claimed. Apply the relevant tax-year rules to the actual records. Editorial policy · AI disclosure.

Business Owners: Are You Overpaying on Taxes?

Get Your Free Tax Assessment